CASE LONDON LIMITED

• ⚠

  Material uncertainty over going concern

  The company's forecasts, taking account of global geopolitical headwinds, the UK's wider economic difficulties, and reasonable changes in trading performance, show the company should be able to operate within the level of its, current facilities. In addition, the directors have also received assurances from the ultimate controlling party and various lenders that they will continue to support the company. Notwithstanding this, due to the cash position of the company, the ending of certain agreements and the net liability 'position of the company's parent undertaking, the events. and conditions present indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern.

1. CASE LONDON LIMITED 2000-03-31 → present
2. REVELATION PICCADILLY LIMITED 1998-11-18 → 2000-03-31
3. PLANMAX LIMITED 1998-09-10 → 1998-11-18

Values shown as filed in the company's annual accounts. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. About these numbers

Margins divide P&L lines by turnover. Gearing is liabilities over total assets. Current ratio is current assets over creditors falling due within one year. Interest cover is operating profit over absolute finance costs. Sector-distribution context coming next.

Accounting basis

FRS 102

Reporting scope

Standalone (parent only)

Auditor

Rawlinson & Hunter Audit LLP

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Material uncertainty disclosed

“The company's forecasts, taking account of global geopolitical headwinds, the UK's wider economic difficulties, and reasonable changes in trading performance, show the company should be able to operate within the level of its, current facilities. In addition, the directors have also received assurances from the ultimate controlling party and various lenders that they will continue to support the company. Notwithstanding this, due to the cash position of the company, the ending of certain agreements and the net liability 'position of the company's parent undertaking, the events. and conditions present indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern.”

Group structure

1. CASE LONDON LIMITED · parent
   1. Revelation Piccadilly Limited 100% · Dormant

Significant events

• “We were also able to agree a new contract extension with Moleskine to operate their UK physical stores for a further 3 years. The agreement was signed on 1st Apil 2024 and runs on to 2027.”
• “the two Gatwick stores closed at the end of March 2024.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

4

last 12 months

Capital events

0

last 24 months

Officers appointed

0

last 12 months

Officers resigned

0

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.

• Turnover

  -18.3%

  £18,936,982 → £15,477,259

• Cash

  +5.2%

  £13,146 → £13,830

• Net assets

  +71.5%

  £846,151 → £1,451,001

• Employees

  -7.5%

  120 → 111

• Operating profit

  -34.9%

  £1,358,008 → £883,977

• Profit before tax

  -42%

  £1,043,054 → £604,850

• Wages

  -4.3%

  £2,906,765 → £2,781,801

Each % is (latest − prior) ÷ |prior| for the line item as filed. The comparison is only shown when the latest and prior accounts cover broadly equal-length periods — short or long stubs (typical around incorporation or a year-end change) are suppressed rather than misrepresented. Lines a company doesn't report are omitted. About these numbers