PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION

1. PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION 2007-09-17 → present
2. PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION 1995-12-08 → 2007-09-17

Values shown as filed in the company's annual accounts. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. About these numbers

Margins divide P&L lines by turnover. Gearing is liabilities over total assets. Current ratio is current assets over creditors falling due within one year. Interest cover is operating profit over absolute finance costs. Sector-distribution context coming next.

Accounting basis

FRS 102

Reporting scope

Consolidated group

Auditor

HaysMac LLP

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Affirmed

“Having considered future budgets and cash flows and taking into account any potential future impact from the increased cost of living, global instability especially within the financial markets, the new autumn budget statements and the impact of NIC to our operating expenses the trustees confirm that they have no material uncertainties about the charity's ability to continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future.”

Group structure

1. PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION · parent
   1. PeTA Europe Limited 100% · England and Wales · educates the public concerning animal abuse, protection and related subjects, and seeking participation in campaigns to end or curtail animal suffering.

Significant events

• “This year marked a turning point in our campaign to end the forced swim test in the UK. Following years of relentless pressure - University of Bristol and the University of Bath both confirmed they will no longer perform this cruel test.”
• “PETA scientists hosted a roundtable with leading European animal protection groups, laying out an actionable plan to replace tests on animals with cutting-edge, humane science, leading to a flash report titled EU Roadmap for Phasing Out Animal Testing.”
• “PETA entities secured major wins in the fashion world. H&M committed to banning new down across all its brands, automaker Renault pledged to end leather interiors, and the British Fashion Council banned wild-animal skins from London Fashion Week.”
• “We continued to expose the suffering of animals used in tourism, including a new PETA Asia investigation into Morocco's tourism industry, leading several UK travel companies to drop animal rides or marine park promotions.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

2

last 12 months

Capital events

0

last 24 months

Officers appointed

0

last 12 months

Officers resigned

0

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.

• Turnover

  +33%

  £5,435,958 → £7,229,760

• Cash

  -13.5%

  £542,832 → £469,286

• Net assets

  +15.7%

  £2,020,357 → £2,337,204

• Employees

  +3.1%

  65 → 67

• Operating profit

  +138.2%

  -£971,945 → £371,098

• Wages

  +7.6%

  £2,484,068 → £2,672,733

Each % is (latest − prior) ÷ |prior| for the line item as filed. The comparison is only shown when the latest and prior accounts cover broadly equal-length periods — short or long stubs (typical around incorporation or a year-end change) are suppressed rather than misrepresented. Lines a company doesn't report are omitted. About these numbers