OTUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED

1. OTUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED 2004-12-21 → present
2. GIBBS TYSER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED 2002-03-13 → 2004-12-21
3. GIBBS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED 2000-10-19 → 2002-03-13

Values shown as filed in the company's annual accounts. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. About these numbers

Accounting basis

FRS 102

Reporting scope

Consolidated group

Auditor

Beavis Morgan Audit Limited

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Affirmed

“At the time of approving the financial statements, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Thus the directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements.”

Group structure

1. OTUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED · parent
   1. Otus Capital Management Limited Partnership · England and Wales · provision of fund management services

Significant events

• “During the year, in the Group's core smaller companies strategy, the Euro A shares of OSCF fell by -8.3%, OSCUF's Euro shares fell by -8.6%. In the micro-cap strategy, MMCF Euro shares fell by -7.0%.”
• “The Group's assets under management decreased during the period from £557.6 to £400.8m - a decrease of 28.1%.”
• “At the end of the period, assets under management in the OSCF amounted to 24.4% of total assets under management (31 March 2024: 20.3%), OSCUF 17.0% (31 March 2024: 17.5%), and MMCF 18.0% (31 March 2024: 13.7%). The remaining 40.6% of assets under management was split between the micro cap strategy managed accounts (32.0%), and the smaller companies strategy managed accounts (8.5%).”
• “The key theme of the Financial Year was one of political instability and economic uncertainty. President Macron's decision to call a snap election in June 2024, the collapse of the coalition government in Germany in November (and the subsequent federal election in March 2025), and the Labour government's austere budget in October were all key drivers in creating a cycle of electoral confusion and market volatility.”
• “The uncertainty sentiment in the markets was further heightened with the re-election of Trump, the ensuing anti-European rhetoric of his administration, and the threat / expectation of tariff implementation.”
• “For Funds' investee companies this economic uncertainty often meant cancelled orders and frozen sales which made forecasting revenue extremely difficult.”
• “A non-controlling interest in the company is held by a shareholder who also committed to make investment in funds under management. As part of the arrangements, the Company is party to an option contract that could possibly involve the company in being obliged to purchase this shareholding at a future date. It is not believed probable that such a purchase will be required and it is judged that such an event is unlikely. The value of the shareholding involved at 28 May 2021 was £300,000.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

4

last 12 months

Capital events

0

last 24 months

Officers appointed

0

last 12 months

Officers resigned

0

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.

• Turnover

  —

  Not reported

• Cash

  -11%

  £1,360,729 → £1,211,529

• Net assets

  +0.3%

  £1,036,652 → £1,039,889

• Employees

  0%

  14 → 14

• Wages

  -23.7%

  £2,079,532 → £1,586,500

  lowest in 3 filed years

Each % is (latest − prior) ÷ |prior| for the line item as filed. Periods don't have to be exactly 12 months apart — a long or short period (typical around incorporation or year-end changes) will distort the comparison. Lines a company doesn't report are omitted. About these numbers