TREMCO CPG UK LIMITED

1. TREMCO CPG UK LIMITED 2020-05-30 → present
2. TREMCO ILLBRUCK LIMITED 2016-01-15 → 2020-05-30
3. TREMCO ILLBRUCK COATINGS LIMITED 2010-01-02 → 2016-01-15
4. TREMCO ILLBRUCK PRODUCTION LIMITED 2006-06-27 → 2010-01-02
5. TREMCO LIMITED 1930-10-10 → 2006-06-27

Values shown as filed in the company's annual accounts. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. About these numbers

Margins divide P&L lines by turnover. Gearing is liabilities over total assets. Current ratio is current assets over creditors falling due within one year. Interest cover is operating profit over absolute finance costs. Sector-distribution context coming next.

Accounting basis

FRS 102

Reporting scope

Standalone (parent only)

Auditor

Kreston Reeves Audit LLP

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Affirmed

“The directors have a reasonable expectation that the company and the RPM group have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The directors recognize the net current liability position as at May 25 and believe that the company has access to sufficient liquidity to pay its liabilities as they fall due and also have received a letter confirming parental support from RPM International Inc., their ultimate parent company. RPM International Inc. has sufficient access to capital to support Tremco CPG UK limited as required.”

Group structure

1. TREMCO CPG UK LIMITED · parent
   1. Tremco CPG Finland OY 100% · Finland · Holding company
   2. GJP Holdings Limited 100% · Holding company
   3. Tremco CPG Structurecare Services Limited 100% · Structural waterproofing and protection
   4. Tor Coatings Limited 100% · Manufacture, supply and distribution of specialist paints and coatings
   5. Tremco Roofing & Facility Services Private Limited 99.98% · India · Sale and installation of roofing related building materials
   6. Tremco illbruck ooo 100% · Distribution of materials to the construction industry - Dormant company
   7. Pitchmastic PMB Limited 100% · Application of bridge deck and car park waterproofing systems and construction in the civil engineering and construction industries
   8. Universal Sealants (U.K.) Limited 100% · Application of sealant compounds and related construction work in the building and civil engineering industries
   9. Pitchmastic PMB LLC 49% · UAE · Application of bridge deck and car park waterproofing systems and construction in the civil engineering and construction industries
   10. Pitchmastic PMB L.L.C. (Oman) 70% · Oman · Dormant company
   11. Pitchmastic PMB L.L.C. (Qatar) 49% · Qatar · Dormant company
   12. Pitchmastic PMB Insulating Materials Contracting Company 75% · Kuwait · Dormant company
   13. PCGUSL Holdings Limited 100% · Holding company

Significant events

• “In 2025, we took over the Tankersley facility from USL. During the year, the site manufactured Pitchmastic products, which were sold back to USL. In Q4, preparations began to transition the site for 2026, focusing on selling Nudura products.”
• “In 2025, we purchased the building in Coventry that had previously been rented as our main R&D centre.”
• “The partial transfer of Carboline production to our sister company in Spain has resulted in a 30% reduction in production of this line in Wigan.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

4

last 12 months

Capital events

1

last 24 months

Officers appointed

0

last 12 months

Officers resigned

1

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.

• Turnover

  +2.3%

  £83,637,751 → £85,564,042

• Cash

  —

  Not reported

• Net assets

  -7%

  £29,789,128 → £27,701,959

• Employees

  +6.8%

  293 → 313

• Operating profit

  -124.5%

  £1,835,616 → -£449,905

• Profit before tax

  -114%

  £18,653,663 → -£2,604,288

• Wages

  +16.7%

  £15,026,950 → £17,541,945

Each % is (latest − prior) ÷ |prior| for the line item as filed. Periods don't have to be exactly 12 months apart — a long or short period (typical around incorporation or year-end changes) will distort the comparison. Lines a company doesn't report are omitted. About these numbers